CONTRA COSTA WATER
DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
August 5, 2009
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
President
Campbell called to order a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the
Contra Costa Water District at 6:30 p.m., at 1331 Concord Avenue, Concord,
the regular meeting place of the Board.
ROLL CALL
Directors
Present: Joseph L.
Campbell, President
Karl
L. Wandry, Vice President
Elizabeth
R. Anello
Bette
Boatmun
John
A. Burgh
Acting General Manager: Jerry D. Brown
Legal
Counsel: Robert
B. Maddow
District Secretary: Sharon L. Burris
President Campbell advised that
General Manager Bishop was on vacation and Assistant General Manager of
Planning/Operations and Maintenance Jerry Brown was Acting General
Manager.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Special Projects Manager Marguerite Naillon led
the pledge of allegiance.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Mr. Brown reported that there were no
changes to the agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENT
President Campbell asked if there were any public
comments. There were no public
comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approve
Directors’ Services/Business and Travel Expenses
a. Future
Services – August
b. Expenses
– July
c. Compensation
– July
2.
Approve the minutes of June 19, 2009.
3.
Approve the warrant register dated August 6, 2009.
President
Campbell removed Agenda Item No. 1.a. Future Services – August from the consent
calendar.
MOTION: Boatmun/Burgh to approve the consent calendar with the
exception of Agenda Item No. 1.a. The
motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
President
Campbell asked for information regarding the Community Garden Group item on the
Board’s activity calendar for August 12.
Director Boatmun responded that it concerned the Monument corridor in Concord. She was contacted by the group to speak and
they were interested in planting a garden for residents in the area.
President
Campbell asked how it involved the District.
Director Boatmun responded that it had to do with planning and
water. President Campbell stated that it
was a City of Concord
(City) planning issue. Director Boatmun indicated
that the City would be participating, along with other groups. She advised that she had also asked Director
Burgh to see if he would like to attend, as it was in his Division.
President
Campbell stated that he did not see the relevance of the District participating
in the activity. Director Boatmun stated
that she was called to speak as a Director and she had also referred the group
to staff. President Campbell stated that
he did not think a Director should be compensated for attending an event that
was not the direct business of the District.
Mr. Brown stated
that staff had been contacted and conservation materials had been provided. The District did not plan to have staff
present at the meeting. Director Boatmun
indicated that she was not aware of this decision and assumed staff would be
attending. She stated that she would still
attend the meeting and requested copies of the materials provided to the
group. She noted that some of the people
participating with the group were Master Gardeners and the District had worked
with Master Gardeners in the past.
President
Campbell stated that he was in favor of removing the item from the activities calendar. He opined that Director Boatmun could attend
but not be compensated for the meeting. He
did not see a benefit for having a Director attend.
Director
Burgh stated that he thought the meeting was of value. The project was moving through the City’s
planning process and a message needed to be conveyed so it could be included in
their planning. All parties should
receive the Board’s message that the District does not give free water. He thought it would be worth having a Director
attend and be compensated to deliver a Board policy message with clarity. The group should be made aware that when they
are looking for land for the garden that they should also be looking for
funding for water.
Director
Wandry commented that this was a City planning question and he did not see the
relevance for the District. The water would
be provided one way or the other depending on the City’s decision. A Boardmember attending the meeting would not
be beneficial to the District.
MOTION: Campbell/Wandry to approve Agenda Item No. 1.a. with the
exception of the August 12 activity. The
motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Campbell, Wandry, Anello,
Burgh Noes: Boatmun.
ACTION
4. Amended Agreement with the California
Department of Water Resources for the Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project
a. Adopt Resolution No. 09-17 authorizing
execution of a ninth amendment to the agreement with the California Department
of Water Resources (DWR) for the Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project for
an additional amount not to exceed $5,650,000 with an agreement total not to
exceed $22,285,000; and
b. Authorize an increase in the FY10 Delta
Projects Department budget of $3,000,000 to be funded by DWR.
Mr. Brown advised that this was the ninth amendment to an
existing agreement with Department of Water Resources (DWR) relating to the Los
Vaqueros (LV) Reservoir Expansion Project.
The contract was task-based and the amendment would allow the District
to restructure some of the tasks, which enabled the District to invoice DWR for
work recently completed. The contract
was non-controversial and was placed on the action calendar due to the
amount. The District had been receiving
payments from the state on the contract and all invoices had been paid in
full.
He advised that Ms. Naillon was available for a presentation
if the Board chose to have one.
President Campbell asked if there were any public
comments. There were no public comments.
It was the consensus of the Board that a presentation was
not necessary.
MOTION: Boatmun/Wandry to
a) adopt Resolution No. 09-17 authorizing execution of a ninth amendment to the
agreement with the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) for the Los
Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion Project for an additional amount not to exceed
$5,650,000 with an agreement total not to exceed $22,285,000; and b) authorize
an increase in the FY10 Delta Projects Department budget of $3,000,000 to be
funded by DWR. The motion carried by a
unanimous voice vote.
5. Award
of Contract – FY10 Treated Water Reservoir Rehabilitation Project
a. Authorize execution of a contract with Crosno
Construction Co. Inc., for the construction of the FY10 Treated Water Reservoir
Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $893,000 with a 10% change order
authority of $89,300 for a total amount not to exceed $982,300; and
b. Authorize an amendment to the agreement with
HDR for additional design services during construction in the amount of
$75,000, for a total amount not to exceed $244,000.
Mr. Brown reported that the project was included in the
Treated Water Reservoir Rehabilitation (TWRR) Program and was also included in
the Ten-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Financial Plan. An update on the TWRR Program was presented to
the Operations and Engineering (O&E) Committee on April 2.
Ten bids were received for the project and the apparent lowest
responsive bidder was Crosno Construction, Inc.
The bid was approximately 15% less than the engineer’s estimate. The item was placed on the action calendar
due to the amount of the contract.
Mr. Brown advised that the amendment to the agreement with
HDR for additional design services was routine.
Design services were not included with the original contract to allow
staff to assess the actual amount of work needed after the end of the
design. Based on similar construction
contracts, an increase for design services during construction was
appropriate.
President Campbell asked if there were any public
comments. There were no public comments.
MOTION: Wandry/Boatmun to
a) authorize execution of a contract with Crosno Construction Co. Inc., for the
construction of the FY10 Treated Water Reservoir Rehabilitation Project in the
amount of $893,000 with a 10% change order authority of $89,300 for a total
amount not to exceed $982,300; and b) authorize an amendment to the agreement
with HDR for additional design services during construction in the amount of
$75,000, for a total amount not to exceed $244,000. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
6. Resolution Authorizing Execution of a
Cooperative Agreement with the United States Bureau of Reclamation for the
Contra Costa Canal Fish Screen Facility Project
a. Adopt Resolution No. 09-18 authorizing
execution of a cooperative agreement with the United States Bureau of
Reclamation for the Contra Costa Canal Fish Screen Facility for an amount not
to exceed $6,700,000;
b. Authorize an increase in FY2010 Department
budgets totaling $6,700,000 to be funded by Reclamation; and
c. Authorize the transfers of labor budgets
within departments to accommodate the Project with no net increase in the
District’s labor budget.
Mr. Brown reported that Engineering Manager Rachel Lenci
would be giving a presentation. Execution
of this agreement was a significant milestone for the District. The project was first authorized by the Central
Valley Improvement Act 1994. Entering
into the agreement would allow the District to be reimbursed for the work performed
for U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation).
Ms. Lenci presented a brief overview of the Contra Costa
Canal Fish Screen Project and the cooperative agreement with Reclamation. She reported that the fish screen was a
regulatory requirement. The District had
received $20 million in economic stimulus funding for the project. The design and construction bid documents for
the initial phase of work had been completed.
Reclamation was finalizing design of the fish screen facility and
planning to begin construction in early 2010.
Using a map, Ms. Lenci identified the project
location. She reported that the District
was selected by Reclamation to provide assistance implementing the
project. A letter had been received from
Reclamation advising that all District costs associated with land acquisition
would be reimbursed. The scope of work
included land and easement acquisition, environment permitting, the initial
phase of construction and construction management, and the bypass pumping
installation and operation.
Mr. Brown advised that the letter received from Reclamation
established a commitment from Reclamation to make reimbursements for all costs
incurred from this date forward.
President Campbell added that this letter was also
discussed during the Board’s legislative visits to Washington, DC
on July 30. He advised that it was conveyed
to the legislators that District costs incurred to this point were not
reimbursable. He clarified for the audience
that the District had to compete to be the contractor on this project. He commented that it was a nice surprise to
return from the trip to Washington
and learn that the District had received the letter.
Ms. Lenci reported that it was anticipated that the cooperative
agreement would allow for reimbursement of costs up to $6.7 million. An increase in the FY10 department budgets in
the amount of $6.7 million would cover the reimbursable expenses, with no net
increases in the department labor budget.
She reviewed the schedule and noted that the initial phase of
construction would be completed in December 2009. Reclamation would be finalizing the design and
anticipated initiation of completion of the fish screen in January 2010, with
completion in early 2011.
Director Wandry asked if the trash rack would be moved to
the other side of the screens or removed entirely. Ms. Lenci responded that the trash rack would
remain in place and would continue to be behind the fish screen. It would be used for future flow control. As part of Reclamation’s project, it would be
modified so the District could install flap gates. This would allow the canal to be isolated
from the Delta in the event of a levee breach.
Director Wandry asked if the trash rack would serve a
purpose beyond what it was being designed for.
Ms. Lenci responded, yes. Mr.
Brown advised that the trash rack would still serve a purpose for removing
large debris.
President Campbell asked if there were any other questions
for the presenter. There were no other
questions.
Director Burgh expressed his satisfaction with staff for
their patience in pursuing the project.
President Campbell reiterated Director Burgh’s
comment. He reviewed the history of the
project and commended staff for developing the project on short notice in order
to qualify for funding through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. He commented that Directors serving on the
O&E Committee had been following the project for several years. He also commented that the District would be
the only water district in the state with all intakes screened.
President Campbell asked if there were any public
comments. There were no public comments.
MOTION: Burgh/Boatmun to a) adopt Resolution No. 09-18
authorizing execution of a cooperative agreement with the United States Bureau
of Reclamation for the Contra Costa Canal Fish Screen Facility for an amount
not to exceed $6,700,000; b) authorize an increase in FY2010 Department budgets
totaling $6,700,000 to be funded by Reclamation; and c) authorize the transfers
of labor budgets within departments to accommodate the Project with no net
increase in the District’s labor budget.
The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
7. Legislative
Affairs Report – August 2009
Review update on legislative issues and adopt District positions
for the following: State Legislation AB 1253 (Fuller) Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta Fish Predation – Watch; SB 283
(DeSaulnier) Department of Water Resources:
Recycled Water Systems – Support;
SB 555 (Kehoe) Eminent Domain Law: Conservation Easements – Change from Oppose Unless Amended to Watch; and Federal Legislation HR 2969
(Capps) Water System Adaption Partnerships Act of 2009 – Support.
Mr. Brown
advised that Director of Public Affairs Jeff Weir would be making a
presentation. He noted that Mr. Weir
would also be providing an update on the state budget and significant Delta
water bills.
Mr. Weir
reported that the state budget was signed on July 28. A review of the bills designed to reduce the
$24.2 billion deficit identified cost shifts, borrowing of local property taxes
from counties, cities and special districts and accelerating collection of
personal income tax withholding. A direct
impact on the District would be the potential shifting of approximately 8% in state-wide
property taxes. A portion of the District’s property taxes could
be dedicated to help the state close the budget gap. This would not have an impact on the District’s
Financial Plan as the funds would be repaid with interest within three years. Mr.
Weir added that Governor Schwarzenegger had called a Special Session on Tax
Reform in September.
Mr. Weir
reported that four Delta bills and one conservation measure would be heard in
the Senate-Assembly Conference Committee on August 18. Areas covered in the Delta bills included:
establishing organizations to oversee and direct activities affecting the
Delta; financing Delta projects using a “beneficiary pays” principles by
collecting annual fees from state and federal contractors and Delta water
diverters; and establishing a Delta Stewardship Council that would complete a
comprehensive management plan by 2011.
In addition, the Department of Fish and Game would oversee and implement
immediate actions projects for the Delta, including fish screens. The rules and reporting requirements for water
diversions would be tightened. New water
quality standards would be established by the State Water Resources Control Board. A requirement for 20% conservation by 2020
would also impose new water management plans for agricultural users.
Director
Boatmun asked who would sit on the Stewardship Council. Mr. Weir responded that it was proposed to be
a seven member Council. Four members
would be appointed by the Governor, one by the Senate, one by the Assembly and one
by the Delta Protection Commission. Director
Boatmun asked about the length of the terms.
Mr. Weir responded that they would have multi-year, staggered terms.
Mr. Weir
presented the following state legislation:
AB 1253 (Fuller) Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta Fish Predation – The bill would create the Bay-Delta Authority and a board
of independent scientists to evaluate the scientific issues of implementing any
Bay-Delta improvement programs. It would
require the authority to review predation of sensitive fish species and
mitigation measures at state and federal export facilities. A valid scientific study could help guide
future restoration programs for endangered species in the Delta and would
impact lawsuits. A Watch position was recommended.
President
Campbell asked Director Boatmun if ACWA used the same legislative nomenclature
that the District uses. Director Boatmun
responded, yes.
SB 283 (DeSaulnier) – Department of
Water Resources: Recycled Water Systems
– Mr. Weir reported
that this bill was designed to expand use of recycled water indoors for homes
and commercial structures. The bill would
extend the deadline to December 31, 2009 to allow DWR to recommend changes to
the Uniform Plumbing Code, for design standards for potable and recycled water
systems. The bill would also repeal a
limitation that currently exists and allows DWR to postpone making “purple
pipe” recommendations unless funds are authorized. The proposed code changes would provide
consistency for public health and safety where purple pipe was used. A Favor
position was recommended.
SB 555 (Kehoe) Eminent Domain: Conservation Easements – The bill would set new requirements
for acquiring property through eminent domain subject to a conservation
easement. The District had opposed the
bill in July because the original language created a potential liability for
double compensation. Assemblyman Kehoe
had accepted the District’s amendments that would eliminate the double-recovery
concern, which was unintended. The
recommended position was to change from Oppose
unless Amended to Watch.
President
Campbell asked if other districts or ACWA had the same concerns as the
District. Mr. Weir responded that there
were other districts with the same concern.
Mr. Weir
presented the following federal legislation:
HR 2969 (Capps) Water System
Adaptation – This bill
would create a new grant program within the Environmental Protection Agency for
water projects that mitigate impacts of climate change. The bill was supported by many water agencies
including ACWA, the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies, California
Association of Sanitation Agencies and the American Water Works
Association. A Support position was recommended.
President
Campbell asked if there were any questions for the presenter.
Director
Boatmun commented that the staff report did not include ACWA’s position on the
federal legislation. Mr. Weir responded
that it was an oversight
President
Campbell clarified the acronym ACWA as the Association of California Water
Agencies for members of the audience.
President
Campbell asked if there were any public comments. There were no public comments.
MOTION: Boatmun/Burgh to adopt District positions for the following:
State Legislation AB 1253 (Fuller) Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Fish Predation
– Watch; SB 283 (DeSaulnier)
Department of Water Resources: Recycled
Water Systems – Support; SB 555
(Kehoe) Eminent Domain Law: Conservation Easements – Change from Oppose Unless Amended to Watch; and Federal Legislation HR 2969
(Capps) Water System Adaption Partnerships Act of 2009 – Support. The
motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
DISCUSSION AND
INFORMATION
8.
Review
construction projects status report.
Mr. Brown
advised that Director of Construction Dan Owre would be making a presentation. He also advised that all of the projects had previously
been reviewed by the O&E Committee.
Mr. Owre
gave an overview of the Construction Department’s efforts during the last
year. He reported that the District had
implemented 19 construction projects.
The treated water system improvements consisted of 12 projects, totaling
$50 million. The untreated water system improvements
consisted of 7 projects, totaling $70 million.
Mr. Owre
reported that all of the projects were within budget and within Board
authority. The focus was to complete all
projects with the highest quality of construction, on schedule and within
budget. Two projects accounted for over
86% of the construction expenditures for the last year. The Alternative Intake Project (AIP) totaled $58
million and the CCWD/City of Brentwood Water
Treatment Plant totaled $42 million. The
AIP constructed a new intake to improve the District’s source of water quality
and assist the possible future construction of the Los Vaqueros Expansion
Project. The AIP consisted of three construction
projects: the Setback Levee Project, the
Intake and Pump Station Project, and the Conveyance Pipeline Project.
Using an
aerial photograph of the project location on Victoria
Island, Mr. Owre identified the AIP intake structure, pump station
and setback levee. He also identified Old River
and the Old River Pump Station locations.
President
Campbell asked when the picture was taken.
Mr. Owre responded that it was mid-June to July.
Using
another photograph, Mr. Owre identified two miles of six foot diameter pipeline
which had been laid from the base of the setback levee to the receiving shaft. He also provided photos and updates on the
AIP pump station and intake.
President
Campbell commented on the progress that had been made on the project since his
site visit on June 24. He asked if the
floor was poured. Mr. Owre responded
that the intake slab was completely poured and work was being done on the
vertical elements. The cofferdam would
be completely removed and the intake would be flooded by November 30.
Mr. Owre
also presented photos of the jacking shaft, which was going underneath Old River,
the Los Vaqueros pipeline and the AIP connection to the LV pipeline.
President
Campbell asked if the tunnel casing extraction had started. Mr. Owre responded, yes, it began today. He then explained the extraction
process.
Mr. Owre
presented the CCWD/City of Brentwood Water Treatment Plant Project (WTP). He reported that the plant provides the City
of Brentwood (Brentwood)
with 15 million gallons of water per day (mgd).
Brentwood was pleased with the quality
of construction and that the water had been delivered approximately four months
ahead of schedule. Aerial views of the
WTP completed on January 1, 2009 were presented.
Mr. Owre
reported on the Canal Elimination and Flood Mitigation Project. He reviewed photos before the start of
construction and progress made to date during construction. The project was due for completion in late
2009.
Mr. Owre next
reviewed additional projects in the Capital Improvement Program. The Country Club Pump Station Expansion
Project was a treated water improvement project adding three pumps and allowing
the District to eliminate the Paso Nogal Pump Station, which had geologic
issues. He identified the location of
the three new pumps. A photo and review
of the Ygnacio Pump Station Solar Power Project was presented. He reported that three sets of solar panels
were completed in 2008. The panels were
working well, saving the District energy costs, and providing approximately 45
kilowatts of “green” energy. The Bollman
Water Treatment Plant Ozone Generator Project was also reviewed. The generators were being added because the
existing generators were nearing the end of their useful life.
Mr. Owre
noted that all of the projects presented were constructed to improve water
quality, water service reliability, emergency preparedness, and the District’s
ability to operate and maintain its treated and untreated water systems.
President
Campbell asked if there were any questions or comments for the presenter.
Director
Burgh commented on the significance of the projects and the District’s efforts
in completing them. He also commended
staff for the foresight in accomplishing the canal replacement before serious
risks occurred for the District and the citizens. He noted the detail summary of the major
construction projects and commented positively regarding the low amount of change
orders. He commended staff on their
knowledge and quality work.
President
Campbell agreed with Director Burgh’s comments regarding quality engineering. He advised that he had spent some time reviewing
the construction drawings for the AIP and good technical work was done. He expressed his appreciation to Ms. Lenci
and Mr. Owre
President
Campbell asked if there were any public comments. There were no public comments.
REPORTS FOR DISCUSSION
9. Committee Report(s)
a. Board
of Supervisors’ Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee Post-Meeting
Report (7/20/09)
President Campbell noted
that he did not attend the Board of Supervisors’ Transportation, Water and
Infrastructure Committee meeting on July 20.
He asked if there were any comments on the post-meeting report. There were no comments.
10. Schedule Future Meeting Dates and Times
Director Boatmun advised that she would be attending a Contra Costa
Special Districts Association Program Committee meeting on August 21, at 11:45
a.m.
REPORTS
11. General
Manager
Mr. Brown reported briefly on Contra Costa
County’s proposal to
provide a water pipeline to Clayton Regency Mobile Home Park on Marsh Creek Road. The Board of Supervisors approved that
agreement at their meeting on August 4.
The City of Brentwood and City of Clayton had both provided
letters of support for the agreement. An
out of area service agreement would be brought to the Board for consideration
at a future date. He added that this
pipeline was for the specific purpose of addressing a public health emergency
at the mobile home park.
Director Wandry asked if the County had initiated the
Environment Impact Report (EIR) process.
Mr. Brown responded, no. The
agreement stipulated that the EIR process would not be initiated until all
parties had executed the agreement.
Mr. Brown also reported that Mr. Bishop would be returning from
vacation on August 19.
12.
Legal Counsel
Mr. Maddow gave a brief update regarding the 2nd Circuit Court
of Appeals confirmation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) decision
regarding National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits for
water transfers.
13.
Board
Members
Director
Burgh advised that he had applied for an exceptions request for his water
allotment due to an additional member of his family moving into his
residence. The person was not living in
his home when the baseline water consumption data was compiled under the
Drought Management Program.
He also
reported that he would defer comments from the Board’s Washington, D.C.
legislative visits to President Campbell.
Director
Boatmun commented that she had distributed the article from the Contra Costa Times concerning the
peripheral canal at the ACWA Board meeting on July 31. She also commented that presentations were
given by Metropolitan Water District’s Bay-Delta
Imported Water Supply Program Manager Randall Neudeck and Santa Clara
Valley Water District’s Special Counsel Greg Zlotnick. Feedback was that a full range of
alternatives should be reviewed. She noted
that it was an interesting, well attended meeting.
Director
Anello did not have a report.
Vice President
Wandry did not have a report.
President
Campbell advised that he would be unable to attend the Board of Supervisors’
Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee meeting on August 17 due to
a scheduling conflict. He would be
speaking to the Sons in Retirement in Walnut
Creek on that same date.
President
Campbell reported that he had attended the annual Board legislative visits in Washington, D.C.,
July 29-31 with Director Burgh and Mr. Bishop.
He advised that due to flight
changes he and Director Burgh were unable to attend a dinner meeting with Mr.
Bishop and the District’s federal lobbyist, Marcus Faust.
President
Campbell gave an overview of the legislative visits. The first meeting was held with staff person Ben
Miller from Congressman George Miller’s office.
The next meeting was held with Reclamation Deputy Commissioner Darryl
Beckmann. A meeting was also held with
Leah Russin and John Watts, staff persons from Senator Diane Feinstein’s
office. An unscheduled meeting was held
with staff from the Water and Energy Subcommittee, and due to this meeting a
scheduled working lunch meeting was not held.
A meeting was also held with Congressman Jerry McNerney. The last meeting was with staff person Lynn
Abramson from Senator Barbara Boxer’s office.
President
Campbell reported that the focus of their visit was to emphasize the necessity
of the fish screens. He referenced the July
30 article in the Contra Costa Times regarding
the peripheral canal and advised that the legislators were aware of the
article. He commented on the new
administration in Washington.
President
Campbell reported that Ben Miller, from Congressman Miller’s office, was very
aware of District issues and issues in the Delta. Leah Russin, who replaced John Watts, in
Senator Diane Feinstein’s office, asked a series of questions and asked for the
location of the fish screens on a map. He
advised that he had extended an invitation to Ms. Russin to visit the District. Ms. Russin accepted the invitation and the
date would be scheduled for some time in September. The meeting with Congressman Jerry McNerney
was cordial. He commented positively on
Lynn Abramson, from Senator Barbara Boxer’s office, who understood District
issues overall.
President
Campbell commented that 50% of the visit was spent introducing themselves, trying
to energize people and reiterating what the District was trying to
accomplish. He advised that it was a
worthwhile visit.
President
Campbell asked if there were any questions.
There were no questions.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:58 p.m., President Campbell adjourned the
meeting to the next regular meeting of the Board of Directors scheduled for August
19, 2009, commencing at 6:30 p.m.
Joseph
L. Campbell, President
ATTEST:
Sharon L. Burris
District Secretary
