CONTRA COSTA WATER
DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
May 6,
2009
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
President
Campbell called to order a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the
Contra Costa Water District at 6:30 p.m., at 1331 Concord Avenue, Concord,
the regular meeting place of the Board.
ROLL
CALL
Directors Present: Joseph
L. Campbell, President
Karl
L. Wandry, Vice President
Elizabeth
R. Anello
Bette
Boatmun
John
A. Burgh
Acting General Manager: Stephen
J. Welch
Legal
Counsel: Robert
B. Maddow
District Secretary: Sharon L. Burris
President Campbell advised that
General Manager Bishop was in Washington, D.C. receiving the American Academy
of Environmental Engineer’s Edward J. Cleary Award. Assistant General Manager Engineering/Construction
Steve Welch was Acting General Manager.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Director of
Operations and Maintenance Pete Schoemann led the pledge of allegiance.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Mr. Welch reported that there were no changes to the
agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENT
President Campbell asked if there were any public comments.
Castle Rock County Water District (CRCWD) Director Fred
Allen addressed the Board on behalf of CRCWD.
He advised that approximately 55 families purchase water from the
District, 75% of the residents used CCWD water in their homes and 9 families
depended on CRCWD water for their homes.
CRCWD water was also used for irrigation and the operation of commercial
businesses, for example, horse boarding stables. He commented that, on April 1, CRCWD was advised
that their water allotment from CCWD would be 55% of historical use. He felt this was unfair because neighbors in
the Walnut Creek
area were only being asked to cutback 15%, while CRCWD was being asked to
cutback 45%.
Mr. Allen stated that he had been in contact with Customer
Service Supervisor John August and
Director of Finance Brice Bledsoe. Residents
using CRCWD water in their homes received a 15% cutback as did the commercial
horse operations. This left more than
75% of the residential home owners cutback by 45%. He referenced a neighborhood in the District
similarly located on one-acre lots which was cutback by 15% based on historical
average.
Mr. Allen also stated that CCWD had been very fair in
maintaining the metering system and helpful with emergency supplies when they
have had breakdowns.
He asked the Board if they had any questions.
President Campbell stated that CRCWD was located in his Division. He knew their system very well, was familiar
with what was taking place and had worked with the residents over a period of time. He also stated that the Board was very
limited in what could be discussed at this meeting. The item was not on the agenda and the Board
would not be able to take any action on this topic. He explained the District’s primary supplier
of water was the federal government, which had advised the District that they would
receive one-half of their allotment. The
Board made the decision that inside water took priority over outside
watering. He also stated that he was
aware of the letters written to the District by CRCWD and the dialogue that had
taken place. He was under the impression
that an exception had been granted.
Mr. Allen stated that the exceptions were for the commercial
water users and they were inline with other exceptions that had been granted to
other customers in the District. There
were approximately 9 homes in the area that survived on CRCWD water only. CCWD agreed to treat them as they were
treating the other residential customers.
The combined total of commercial users and residents relying on CRCWD
water brought the allocation from 55% to 64%.
This left 75% of the homeowners in CRCWD cutback to 55% of their
historical use.
President Campbell reiterated that a discussion could not
take place at this meeting because it was not agendized. At President Campbell’s recommendation, Mr.
Allen agreed to work with District staff to resolve the issues.
Director Boatmun asked Mr. Allen if he felt it was unfair
that their outside irrigation was being cut back. Mr. Allen said yes. He commented on the cooperation he had
received from Mr. Bledsoe and Mr. August.
He stated that, when the agreement was made, he indicated there were
further issues and a letter had been sent addressing those issues. He stated that the homeowners were not satisfied
with what had been accomplished since the majority did not receive more water. President Campbell clarified that the
District would work with Mr. Allen since he was the customer of record. Mr.
Welch advised that staff would work with him.
Mr. Allen thanked the Board.
President Campbell commented that completing a Speaker’s
Cards was appreciated as it provided a way to contact the speaker should
additional information be requested, but it was not necessary to complete one
to speak to the Board.
President Campbell invited Concord resident Bird Morningstar to the
podium. Mr. Morningstar referenced
language concerning water management on a District water bill he had received. He felt the language was more appropriate for
a fall watering schedule rather than a spring watering schedule. He felt it was important to update this
language due to the drought.
Director Boatmun asked about the date on the bill. Mr. Morningstar responded the bill was dated
April 28.
President Campbell thanked Mr. Morningstar for his comments.
Mr. Welch advised that staff would review the language and
revise it as necessary.
CONSENT
1. Approve
Directors’ Services/Business and Travel Expenses
a. Future
Services – May
b. Expenses
– March/April
c. Compensation
– April
2. Approve the minutes of April 1,
2009.
3.
Approve the warrant register dated May 7, 2009.
4.
Authorize execution of an amended agreement with Ironhouse
Sanitary District for the disposal of Contra Costa Water District solids for a
term of five years, with the option to extend in additional five-year
increments.
5.
Authorize execution of a contract with Power Substation
Services for transformer maintenance services for a total amount not to exceed
$60,000.
6.
Authorize execution of a lease amendment with John Muir
Health for parking on 2.4 acres of District property in Concord for a one-year term for rent of
$79,040, with the option to renew for an additional year at $79,040.
MOTION: Boatmun/Burgh to
approve the consent calendar. The motion
carried by a unanimous voice vote.
ACTION
7.
Disclosure of Specific Customer Records during the Current
Water Shortage Condition
a.
Conduct a public hearing to provide information and receive
comments on the proposed exception to withholding customer records; and
b.
Adopt Resolution No. 09-06 establishing a limited exception
to the policy of withholding customer records information from public
inspection during the period of the declared water shortage condition.
President Campbell welcomed two gentlemen in the
audience from Renaissance Club Sport in Walnut
Creek.
Mr. Welch advised that the District had received a public
records act request from KNTV – NBC Bay Area News for the top ten commercial
high-water users. He also noted that the
District had received this similar type of request in the past, and in one
instance the District had challenged the request in court but did not
prevail. He advised that Public Affairs
Director Jeff Weir would be making a presentation on this item, which could
possibly provide for the release of public records during drought conditions
for all customer classes. He also
advised that the District had done outreach to customers who would be impacted
by this specific public records act request.
Mr. Weir reported that District regulations protected the
release of customer information except when the Board determines an exception
applied. State law requires a finding
that the information disclosed outweighs the public interest in withholding the
data. Prior case law generally required
release of the information in this type of situation. The water shortage condition declared by the
Board on March 4 represented a unique circumstance. There is a strong public interest in how the
District is operating during drought conditions which could benefit from the disclosure
of information accounting for water usage.
Mr. Weir reported that a public hearing was noticed in the Contra Costa Times on April 24 and posted at additional locations
within the District. Public outreach had
taken place and customers affected by the release of the information had been
contacted. The District would be working
with the affected customers to ensure proper context for information released. Pending adoption of the resolution, the
information being released would include the customer’s name, city, and water
usage in 2008. The resolution would
apply only during the period of a declared water shortage and would apply to
all customer classes.
President Campbell asked the Board if they had any
questions for the presenter.
Director Burgh asked for clarification on the “data” being
released. Mr. Welch responded that it
would be broken down by the billing period.
President Campbell opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m.
President Campbell asked if anyone would like to address
the Board. There were no comments.
President Campbell closed the public hearing at 7:05 p.m.
Director Burgh commented that the volume of water a
customer uses had a context. He felt
that footnotes or a preamble along with the data to highlight the context was
important so that it could remain in that context.
Director Boatmun commented that the District needed to
follow the law. She referenced an
earlier case where the District was sued for not providing residential customer
water use data and pointed out that the District had lost the case. She advised that staff was extremely helpful
in helping customers conserve and encouraged the public to make use of this
service. She did not wish to spend the
public’s money on another lawsuit.
Director Wandry commented that he was not convinced that
the public need outweighed the privacy in this particular case. He opined that it was too early in the implementation
of the drought program to reach any conclusions other than to just give out
numbers. As suggested by Director Burgh,
numbers could mean different things and different conclusions could be drawn
from them. He noted that the media was
not present at the meeting to answer questions.
He stated that action was premature and he would be opposing the
recommendation.
President Campbell commented that he agreed with all of the
comments voiced. He stated that he was
also concerned about how the context of the information would be reported. He noted how the District had conserved water
despite increased population. The
District delivered the same amount of water last year that it delivered to its
customers 31 years ago and the population had increased by 200,000. He opined that the District would have to
produce the information requested. He
concurred with staff’s approach to release the minimum amount of information in
accordance with the law.
Mr. Maddow commented on the legal context regarding the
decision before the Board. He referred
to the case Director Boatmun referenced and reaffirmed that the District was in
fact sued by a newspaper seeking information on the top 100 residential water
users. The District lost the case and
had to incur the newspaper’s attorney fees.
The District took the position that the information could subject
District customers to harassment and possible harm. The Court of Appeals ruled that possible
endangerment did not outweigh the public interest and its access to these
public records during a drought.
Director Burgh commented that after reflecting on the observations
by Director Wandry and Mr. Maddow, he would suggest that the Board limit the
information to exactly what was requested and not have the exception to the
policy apply to all customer categories.
Mr. Maddow advised that the Board could make a
determination that the release of information be limited without running afoul
of the statute or the District’s regulation.
Mr. Welch pointed out that it would just be a matter of
time before the District received additional requests for other customer
categories and it would take this same process to address those requests.
Director Boatmun commented that delaying the action would not
be cost effective and would only postpone the inevitable. The information released should be limited to
the information requested. She recognized
that there were individual companies who were doing a great deal to implement
conservation. She advised that she would be supporting the
recommendation.
MOTION: Boatmun/Campbell to Adopt Resolution No. 09-06
establishing a limited exception to the policy of withholding customer records
information from public inspection during the period of the declared water
shortage condition. The motion carried
by the following vote of the Board:
Ayes: Boatmun, Campbell, Anello,
Burgh Noes: Wandry
REPORTS FOR DISCUSSION
8. Committee Report(s)
a. Bay
Area Water Forum Post-Meeting Report (4/27/09)
b. Board
of Supervisors’ – Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee
Post-Meeting Report (4/29/09)
President Campbell
reported that he and Director Burgh attended the Board of Supervisors,
Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee meeting on April 27. He referenced Agenda Item No. 7 and noted
that there was a discrepancy between the information that was faxed to him from
the District and the information provided at the meeting.
County staff reported at
the meeting that they had changed the report because they wanted to provide the
committee with the latest information available on the water situation. A Board order was attached to the meeting
packet that recommended the material be substituted on a three-fourths vote. The discussion proceeded although formal
approval could not be obtained until a later date.
Director Burgh stated
that President Campbell’s report was an accurate rendition of his
observations.
President Campbell asked
if there were any other comments on the reports. There were no other comments.
9. Schedule Future Meeting Dates
and Times
There
were no future meetings dates and times to schedule.
REPORTS
10. General
Manager
Mr. Welch reported that approximately 30 District employees
had read 61,000 water meters during a five-day period to complete an important
element of the Districts Drought Management Program. This effort established the same baseline for
all customers. He commended District
staff for their efforts.
Mr. Welch also reported briefly on the District’s water
supply. Although there had been some
rainfall there had also been a snowpack reduction and the water supply remained
the same as what had been reported to the Board on April 1. He also reminded the Board that the Employee
Picnic would be held at Los Vaqueros on May 16.
11. Legal
Counsel
Mr. Maddow commended the meter reading accomplishment by District
employees, and noted that he had received positive comments from other agencies
on this effort.
12.
Board
Members
Director
Anello did not have a report.
Vice
President Wandry did not have a report.
Director
Burgh reported that he had spoken at the Pleasant Hill City Council meeting on
May 4. The Chairman of the Diablo Vista
Water Service (DVWS) Advisory Committee made a presentation related to DVWS and
their efforts to implement the District’s drought management plan. He commented that the concerns expressed were
the same as those from Castle Rock County Water District and the comments he had
received at his presentation to the Berkshire Village Association. DVWS
requested that he convey their comments to the Board.
Director
Burgh also reported that he attended the Contra Costa Special District
Association meeting on April 20, where Contra
Costa Times columnist, Dan
Borenstein was the featured speaker. The
topic was public employee retirement benefit package spiking. He stated that it
was a very interesting presentation. He also
congratulated staff on the Downtown Main Replacement Project. He noted that he had received several
positive comments on the way the project was managed. He also advised that he would be out of town
and unable to attend the May 13 Board meeting and the Employee Picnic on May
16.
Director
Boatmun reported that she would also be unable to attend the Employee Picnic
due to a prior commitment.
President
Campbell also commented positively on the Downtown Main Replacement Project and
noted that he had not received any negative comments about how the project was
being managed. He also commented on an
envelope in his Board packet that did not have a return address. He stated that in keeping with his practice,
he would not be opening it. He returned
the unopened envelope to the District Secretary.
CLOSED SESSION
13.
Conference
with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation under Government Code 54956.9(a) CCWD-Diablo
Water District Arbitration.
14.
Conference
with Legal Counsel – Consideration of Initiating Litigation as allowed under
Government Code 54956.9(c) – one case.
At 7:36 p.m.,
President Campbell announced that the Board would move into closed session. There were two matters before the Board
concerning litigation and they did not require the announcement of additional
attendees.
RECONVENE FROM CLOSED SESSION
15.
Report
on closed session.
At 8:05 p.m.,
President Campbell reconvened the meeting and announced that the Board did not
take any action on the matters before it.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:06 p.m., President Campbell adjourned the meeting to an adjourned regular meeting of the
Board of Directors scheduled for May 13, 2009, commencing at 6:30 p.m.
Joseph
L. Campbell, President
ATTEST:
Sharon L. Burris
District Secretary