CONTRA
COSTA WATER DISTRICT
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
BOARD STUDY SESSION
June 12, 2008
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
An adjourned regular meeting of the Board of Directors
was called to order at 8:15 a.m., at the District Administration
Building, located 2411 Bisso Lane, Concord.
ROLL CALL
Directors
Present: Elizabeth Anello,
Vice President
Bette Boatmun
John
Burgh
Karl
Wandry
Directors Absent: Joseph L. Campbell, President
General
Manager: Walter J. Bishop
Legal Counsel
Absent: Robert B. Maddow
District
Secretary: Sharon
L. Burris
President Campbell
was absent from the meeting and had previously notified the Board.
Mr. Bishop provided the Board with a memo concerning increased
diversions from the Sacramento River by the U.S.
Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation).
Discussion took place on the memo and Mr. Bishop explained the potential
impacts and efforts taking place to protect the District’s interests. Director Boatmun commented on an Association
of California Water Agencies (ACWA) Region 4 meeting she had attended and ACWA’s
awareness of the situation.
ADOPTION OF
AGENDA
Facilitator Lee Shuff
reviewed the agenda and asked if there were any changes. There were no changes.
Mr.
Shuff also reviewed the purpose and desired outcome of the study session,
described the ground rules, and advised on the purpose of the “Issue Bin.”
PUBLIC COMMENT
Facilitator Shuff asked if there were any public
comments. There were no public
comments. He welcomed the District’s two
lobbyists: Federal Lobbyist Marcus Faust and State Lobbyist Julie
Malinowski-Ball.
DISCUSSION AND INFORMATION
1. Federal Legislative Representative
Mr. Faust
began his presentation by stating that the 2008 presidential election could be
perceived as one of the most significant elections in the last 40 years. He commented on the pros and cons of both
parties and noted that there had been an increase in voter registration for
voters 18-25 years of age. He also commented
on the impacts this election could have on the District. He noted that the current focus in Washington was not on
passing legislation or addressing issues.
Addressing
appropriations for District projects, including the Los Vaqueros Reservoir Expansion
(LVE), the Alternative Intake Project (AIP), the appropriations from the Water Resources
Development Act (WRDA), and the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers for the canal
lining project, Mr. Faust opined that it was unlikely that the related bills would pass until after the November
election. He also referenced Judge
Oliver Wanger’s decision on
delta smelt and how it could impact funding for District projects.
Mr. Faust
anticipated that a continuing resolution would be in place for FY09 and no new
appropriations would be made until after November. He discussed earmarks pending the outcome of
the election. He advised that many
appointees had already left Washington
and had found jobs elsewhere.
Mr. Faust
commented positively on Reclamation Commissioner Bob Johnson. He referenced a meeting he attended where Mr.
Bishop briefed the Commissioner on District projects. He also commented favorably on Mr. Bishop’s testimony at the Congressional
hearing on the Bay-Delta.
Discussion
took place on Water Restoration Fund payments.
Mr. Faust commented that Congressman George Miller supported the concept
of utilities proceeding with immediate/emergency actions as an offset to
Restoration Fund payments. Mr. Bishop
explained how the offsets would work to benefit various agencies.
Mr.
Bishop advised that the South Bay Aqueduct agencies were considering how to address
water concerns. The District was meeting
with these agencies to make them aware of the benefits of LVE, and how partnering
with the District would have a positive impact.
Discussion took place on the possibility of federal and regional
partners for LVE, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) certification, and the
District’s desired outcome for the project.
The Board
took a short break at 9:35 a.m.
The Board
reconvened at 9:45 a.m.
2. State Legislative Representative
Ms. Malinowski-Ball referenced the November election and commented
that it would most likely be contentious for four Districts in the state. She commented on the new leadership in Sacramento, including the
new Speaker of the House Karen Bass and the next Senate President Pro-Tem Darrell
Steinberg.
Ms. Malinowski-Ball noted that discussions were taking
place in both the Senate and Assembly on the water bond strategies. She advised that the previous water bond appropriation
was in conference committee for one year.
She advised that both houses were ready to appoint conference committee
members to address the State’s budget. The
first conference committee hearing was scheduled for June 12.
Discussion took place on the budget process and strategies
between both the Senate and Assembly.
Discussion continued on new fees and taxes which could be included in
the budget to help balance the deficit. Ms.
Malinowski-Ball noted that protecting social and education programs were a
priority in Sacramento
at the present time.
Ms. Malinowski-Ball commented on the number of citizens appearing
daily at the Capitol to complain about the economy.
The Board thanked Ms. Malinowski-Ball for her
presentation.
3. Current Status of the Delta
Mr. Bishop noted that Assistant General Manager of Water
Resources Greg Gartrell would be making a presentation. He also commented on the schedule for the
LVE.
Dr. Gartrell reviewed activities at the state level related
to Judge Wanger’s decision and the effects that his decision would have on the District’s
projects and the Delta. He also
commented on the fish screens that the District has at Old River
and reported that the District had
not taken any smelt this year.
Discussion took place on filling Los Vaqueros Reservoir and
the anticipated chloride levels.
Dr. Gartrell advised that biological opinions for delta
smelt, salmon, and steelhead were being revised due to two recent court
decisions by Judge Wanger invalidating the previous biological opinions. The outcome of the decisions would determine
Delta water quality and water supply conditions for the foreseeable
future. Discussion took place on the
biological opinions and the District’s position.
Dr. Gartrell reviewed the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP)
and advised that a range of alternatives for conveyance and ecosystem projects
were being examined. The BDCP was considering
near-term actions that could resolve issues quickly since any major changes in
conveyance would take a long time to implement.
Discussions took place on interim and near-term actions, the condition
of the Delta levees, a dual conveyance system, and water quality.
Dr. Gartrell discussed Delta Vision’s Strategic Plan and
reviewed some of the key issues being considered. He advised that the plan deals with all
issues including levees, communities, land use, infrastructure, emergency
response, immediate and near-term actions, water conveyance, water supply and
ecosystem as co-equal values, ecosystem restoration in the Delta and governance. He
reported that the Delta Vision viewpoint was more comprehensive than the BDCP’s. It was not clear in the BDCP that the water
supply and ecosystem were equal values.
Dr. Gartrell reported that Delta Vision’s Blue Ribbon Task
Force was stressing the importance of identifying, evaluating and implementing
near-term measures to improve Delta ecosystem functions and water system
reliability pending completion of new capital facilities that could take years
to complete. Staff continues to participate
in Stakeholder Committee meetings to protect District interests and emphasize
immediate actions to deal with the impending crisis in the Delta.
Dr. Gartrell reviewed the Delta activities schedule for the
biological opinions relating to operation of the Central
Valley and State Water Projects, the BDCP and Delta Vision.
Addressing the LVE Project, Dr. Gartrell advised that the
existing reservoir capacity was 100,000 acre-feet. Alternatives were presented using the present
and proposed expanded reservoir sizes.
Special Project Managers Marguerite Naillon gave an update
on the LVE. She advised that the
administrative draft Environment Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR)
had been submitted to Reclamation, the Department of Water Resources, and Western
Power for review. A public draft of the
EIS/EIR would be available in the fall.
She reviewed the schedule and advised that the anticipated date for the
Board’s consideration of certification would be as early as January 2009.
Ms. Naillon addressed the project alternatives currently
under consideration. She reiterated Dr.
Gartrell’s comments concerning the options for increasing the size of the
reservoir, the operational focus, the Delta intake facilities and conveyance.
4. General Manager/Legal Counsel/Board
Member Comments
Mr. Bishop commented on District projects as they related
to state and federal funding. He also
commented that the District would remain focused on partnering for
projects.
Mr. Maddow commented
briefly on a hearing being held by Judge Wanger concerning salmon.
Director Burgh commended staff and encouraged them to stay
focused. He also suggested the
possibility of renaming the LVE project so that it would have instant name
recognition for the public. Mr. Bishop
replied that LVE was used through the EIS/EIR document and provided consistency.
Director Boatmun thanked staff for the updates.
Vice President
Anello commented on the information received and thanked staff.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:37 a.m. The next regular meeting of the Board of
Directors was scheduled for June 18, 2008, commencing at 6:30 p.m.
Joseph
L. Campbell, President
ATTEST:
Sharon L. Burris
District Secretary