CONTRA COSTA WATER
DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
September
5, 2007
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
President
Campbell called to order a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the
Contra Costa Water District at 6:32 p.m., at 1331 Concord Avenue, Concord,
the regular meeting place of the Board.
ROLL
CALL
Directors Present: Joseph
L. Campbell, President
Bette
Boatmun
Karl
L. Wandry
Directors Absent: Elizabeth
R. Anello, Vice President
John
Burgh
General Manager: Walter
J. Bishop
Legal
Counsel: Robert
B. Maddow
District
Secretary: Sharon
L. Burris
President
Campbell advised that Vice President Anello and Director Burgh were absent from
the meeting and that they were excused absences.
PLEDGE
OF ALLEGIANCE
Senior Engineer Jeff Quimby led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Mr.
Bishop advised that there was a memo before the Board revising Agenda Item No.
1.a. - Future Services – September.
PUBLIC COMMENT
President Campbell asked for public comments. There were no public comments.
1. Approve
Directors’ Services/Business and Travel Expenses
a.
Future Services – September
b.
Expenses – August
c. Compensation
– August
2. Approve the following minutes:
a. August 1, 2007
b. August
15, 2007
3. Approve the warrant register dated September
6, 2007.
4. Agreement with Richard Denton for Water
Resources planning assistance
a. Determine that it is in the best interest of
the District to engage a former employee, Dr. Richard A. Denton, to provide
Water Resources planning assistance; and
b. Authorize execution of an agreement in
conformance with District Regulations Chapter 3.05 with Dr. Richard A. Denton
for consulting services in an amount not to exceed $40,000.
5. Authorize an agreement with Geomatrix
to provide consultant services related to the Randall-Bold Groundwater
Monitoring Project, for a total amount not to exceed $240,000. Expenditure of costs beyond FY08 will depend
on Board approval of the 2009-2010 Budget.
MOTION: Boatmun/Wandry to
approve the consent calendar. The motion
carried by a unanimous voice vote.
ACTION
6. Authorize execution of a Streambed Alteration
Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game for the Canal
Replacement Project and issuance of Letters of Credit as required by the Agreement.
Mr. Bishop advised that Director of Planning Jerry Brown
would be giving a presentation.
Mr. Brown reported that the Department of Fish and Game
(DFG) required the agreement for the Canal Replacement Project. The long-term agreement permitted replacement
of the entire four miles of unlined canal with a pipeline. He advised that 145 acres of property at
Holland Tract had been identified as mitigation for project impacts. A separate contract with Wildlands, Inc. was
being proposed to carry out the mitigation on Holland Tract.
Mr. Brown reviewed the key terms of the agreement including
the scope, mitigation, timeline and Letters of Credit. He reported that the District’s
responsibility for Holland Tract ended when the mitigation was accepted by DFG. The mitigation ratio was 1:1 and was required
prior to or concurrent with construction, with the exception of Phase 1. DFG had agreed to proceed into construction
with the understanding that Letters of Credit would be provided as a financial
commitment that the mitigation would be provided in due time.
Mr. Brown reported that four separate letters of credit
would be provided and identified them as $114,000 for land acquisition, $67,000
for habitat construction, $37,462 interim site management, and $619,318 for long-term
endowment. The Letters of Credit would
be released after meeting specified milestones.
The fiscal impact was $2.82 million, which was to be paid under contract
with Wildlands, Inc. The award of the
construction contract for the initial phase of the Canal Replacement Project
was scheduled for September 19 and the release of the Letters of Credit would occur
in six to twenty-four months.
Discussion took place on the Letters of Credit
methodology. Responding to a question
from Director Boatmun concerning if the methodology was usual for this type of
agreement, Mr. Bishop replied no. Mr.
Bishop commended Mr. Brown and Senior Planner Mark Seedall for their creativity
in working on the agreement.
Director Wandry also commended staff for their creativity on
the agreement. He commented that he had
never seen a situation handled in this manner.
President Campbell also commented on the creativity of the plan, but
expressed concern for the long term existence of Wildlands, Inc.
Discussion took place on the expertise of Wildlands, Inc.
in dealing with this type of mitigation.
Director Wandry asked how staff arrived at 145 acres of
property for four miles of canal. Mr.
Brown responded that it was computed by using the water surface and the width
of the right-of-way beyond the water service on the levees. Director Wandry asked if the District would
own the entire right-of-way. Mr. Brown
responded, yes. Responding to a question
from Director Wandry concerning the lifetime of the long-term endowment, Mr. Bishop
replied that it would be forever. Director Wandry asked if the first contract
was between DFG and the District. Mr.
Brown responded, yes. Director Wandry
then asked if the second contract would be between the District and Wildlands,
Inc. Mr. Brown responded, yes. Mr. Bishop commented that the District’s
responsibility would end at that time.
The DFG would be responsible for selecting the provider for the
long-term maintenance.
President Campbell asked if there were any public
comments. There were none.
MOTION: Wandry/Boatmun to
authorize execution of a Streambed Alteration Agreement with the California
Department of Fish and Game for the Canal Replacement Project and issuance of
Letters of Credit as required by the Agreement.
The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
7. Authorize execution of an agreement
with Wildlands, Inc. for mitigation associated with the Canal Replacement
Project, for an amount not to exceed $2,820,000.
Mr. Bishop reported that Board approval of the agreement
with Wildlands, Inc., which would provide the required mitigation for the Canal
Replacement Project, was needed to proceed with construction of the
project. Wildlands, Inc. was identified
as the only experienced operator of mitigation property that could meet the
District’s schedule and had the recommendation of the regulatory agencies.
Mr. Bishop advised that the implementation of the
mitigation would be phased. The first
phase would be completed in 2008 and all phases of mitigation were anticipated
to be complete by 2012.
Mr. Bishop advised that Wildlands, Inc. would be paid
through an escrow agreement, which would include development of the property
through the specifications of the District’s permit with DFG.
MOTION: Wandry/Boatmun to
authorize execution of an agreement with Wildlands, Inc. for mitigation
associated with the Canal Replacement Project, for an amount not to exceed
$2,820,000. The motion carried by a
unanimous voice vote.
8. Annual Reserve Policy Review and 2007 Fiscal
Year-End Budget Report
a. Authorize
additional District funding in the amount of $5.4 million for the Alternative
Intake Project;
b. Authorize a $4.0
million deposit to the Retiree Health Insurance Reserve Fund to continue the
funding required under Governmental Accounting Standards Board rule (GASB 45);
and
c. Adopt
revision of the Reserve Policy to establish a Drought Contingency Reserve Fund
in the amount of $3.5 million.
Mr. Bishop reported that the FY07 budget year-end results
and reserve fund allocations were reviewed by the Finance Committee on August
21, 2007. The $12.9 million net year-end
results were attributed to savings by the Operations and Maintenance Department
and higher revenues due to the warm weather.
Mr. Bishop reviewed the proposed reserve allocations and
the revision to the Reserve Policy, which was to establish a Drought
Contingency Reserve Fund in the amount of $3.5 million. The fund would mitigate the fiscal impacts of
a continued drought.
Director Boatmun asked if it was possible to increase the
amount in the fund. Mr. Bishop advised
that by doing so, it would reduce reserves and it would need to be accounted
for in subsequent years. President
Campbell advised that he would be willing to increase the fund if necessary at
a future date.
Discussion took place in increasing the amount in the
fund. Mr. Bishop noted that an analysis will
be done after the Bureau completed the allocations in January 2008, and the
Board would be advised at that time if there appeared to be net positive
results. He suggested that an increase
in the Drought Fund allocation be reviewed at mid-year.
President Campbell commented that given the unknowns he
would like to revisit the item at a future date if there would be a net
positive.
President Campbell asked for public comments. There were none.
Director Wandry expressed a concern that if there was a
surplus on an ongoing basis without extraordinary circumstances that the Board
would need to consider addressing this further.
MOTION:
Wandry/ Boatmun to a) authorize additional District funding in the amount
of $5.4 million for the Alternative Intake Project; b) Authorize a $4.0 million deposit to the
Retiree Health Insurance Reserve Fund to continue the funding required under
Governmental Accounting Standards Board rule (GASB 45); and c) adopt revision
of the Reserve Policy to establish a Drought Contingency Reserve Fund in the
amount of $3.5 million. The motion
carried by a unanimous voice vote.
DISCUSSION AND INFORMATION
9. Review report and comment on the District’s
Facilities Reserve Charges.
Mr. Bishop reported that Mr. Quimby would be making a
presentation on the status of the District’s Facility Reserve Charge
(FRC).
Mr. Quimby explained that the FRC was a one-time fee
intended to recover the cost of the facility required to serve new
customers. He reviewed the current
method adopted by the Board in 1998 and explained that the fee was set at 90
percent of the calculated value. The FRC
was reviewed in 2003 and a policy was implemented to adjust the FRC annually by
inflation. The Treated Water Master Plan
(TWMP) and the Future Water Supply Study (FWSS) form the basis for many of the
assumptions in the FRC. Mr. Quimby reported
that continued use of the 90 percent of calculated value resulted in a
significant subsidy by the District.
Addressing a policy question, Mr. Quimby asked the Board if
the District’s FRC should be based on the actual calculated fee, or some factor
greater than 90 percent. He used an
example of fees using 95 percent of the calculated value. He advised that the new fee could be phased to
mitigate the impact. He advised that if
the Board were to consider changes to the FRC that they would be incorporated
in the annual review of rates, fees and charges when they would be considered
for Board adoption in January 2008.
Mr. Bishop reminded the Board that the item was not for
action but information.
President Campbell asked if the 90 percent fee was
accurate. Mr. Bishop replied that it was
accurate based on the current methodology.
Director Boatmun asked if the 90 percent charge was decided at the time
the fee was discussed with interested parties, and if there were indications
from the District that the fee was subject to increase. President Campbell recalled that the Board
guaranteed the 90 percent charge for a reasonable amount of time. The question he had was if a reasonable
amount of time had passed. The second
thing they had originally agreed to was to phase the implementation.
President Campbell asked for comments.
Director Wandry clarified that the Board’s direction was to
review the FRC and to revisit other options at a later date. Mr. Bishop replied that other options could
be presented. Director Boatmun and President
Campbell agreed with considering 95 percent and 100 percent options.
President Campbell commented positively and commended Mr.
Quimby on his presentation.
REPORTS FOR DISCUSSION
10. Committee Report(s)
a. Board
of Supervisors’ – Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee
Post-Meeting Report (8/13/07)
b. Finance
Committee Post-Meeting Report (8/21/07)
President Campbell asked
if there were any comments on the committee reports. There were no comments.
11. Schedule
Future Meeting Dates and Times
There were no future meeting dates
and times to schedule.
REPORTS
12. General
Manager
Mr. Bishop reported that the Association of California
Water Agencies Region 5 election would be held on September 30, 2007. He
advised that the item could be agendized for a future meeting, or the Board
could authorize the District’s ACWA Representative Director Boatmun to vote her
conscience in the election, as they had done in the past. It was the consensus of the Board not to
agendize the item, and to have Director Boatmun vote her conscience.
Mr. Bishop reported briefly on the water rights situation
that was currently taking place in California.
13. Legal
Counsel
Mr. Maddow also reported briefly on the water rights
situation and on supplemental complaints being filed by petitioners concerning
a biological opinion.
14. Board Members
Director
Wandry reported that he would be out of town and would not be attending the
Board meeting on September 19.
Director
Boatmun did not have a report.
President
Campbell commented on a thank you letter that the Board received from former Boardmember
Ernest Lasell’s family and noted that he appreciated receiving it. He also commented on Guy Bjerke’s recent
appointment to the Concord City Council and extended his congratulations.
President
Campbell commented on the fact that three Boardmembers were planning to attend
the California Special District Association Conference in October. He appealed to the Boardmembers to reconsider
whether that level of participation was needed at the conference considering
that it conflicted with a scheduled Board meeting date.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:15 p.m.,
President Campbell adjourned the meeting to the next regular meeting of the Board
of Directors scheduled for September 19, 2007 commencing at 6:30 p.m.
Joseph
L. Campbell, President
ATTEST:
Sharon L. Burris
District Secretary