Bay Delta Conservation Plan/California WaterFix
The Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) has been under development since 2006 and was initially proposed to reduce the impacts of exporting water from the Delta. The Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) agrees that the Delta is in need of changes to meet the co-equal goals to provide reliable/high quality water and provide a healthy ecosystem for fish to thrive. As a Delta water user, CCWD has been participating in many collaborative efforts to identify ways to improve the Delta, for many years. CCWD has provided constructive input throughout the development of the BDCP and evaluating how proposed projects may impact local facilities and operations.
The BDCP has evolved over the years into the, now named, California WaterFix (CWF), or the “twin tunnels”. This proposed project by state officials would construct additional intake and conveyance facilities to transport water from the Delta to other parts of the state.
From the beginning, CCWD’s concerns have remained focused on potential impacts to water quality, and construction, and those have been communicated to the state in various public settings. Other concerns focused on federal financing and contract supply allocation, as CCWD is a Central Valley Project contractor, have been communicated to federal agencies.
The state listened and approached CCWD about our concerns, and in early 2016 CCWD was able to successfully reach a settlement agreement with the state that will protect drinking water quality for CCWD customers should the CWF be implemented in the future. This settlement will result in the construction and maintenance of new facilities that will offset any potential impacts the CWF could have; all paid for by the state, not CCWD customers. We take our role of serving our customers seriously, and we view this settlement is an insurance policy to prevent future impacts for our customers, should the CWF be built.
This legally binding agreement will not result in user rate increases or redirect any potential impacts. The CCWD Board of Directors is not a proponent of the CWF, and this agreement does not make the CWF more likely to be built. CCWD will remain active on outstanding issues related to federal financing and contract allocations. To learn more about this settlement and how it will protect those CCWD serves, please view the fact sheet, agreement summary, FAQs, and other documents below.
- Settlement Agreement
- CCWD News Release
- Fact Sheet
- Agreement Summary
- On Tap Customer Newsletter
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
- CCWD/EBMUD Principles of Agreement
- Reclamation Letter to CCWD
- Joint CVP Contractor Letter to Reclamation
- Letter from B. Schussman to S. Kenner, DWR
- Letter from D. Coty to F. Marcus, SWRCB
- April 6, 2016 Board of Directors' Meeting Presentation
- April 6, 2016 Board of Directors' Meeting Docket Items
- May 17, 2017 Board of Directors' Meeting Presentation (PDF)
- May 17, 2017 Board of Directors' Meeting Docket Items (PDF)
- Response Letter to Sierra Club on CCWD's Agreement with DWR & the Brown Act, May 6, 2016
- CCWD Comments on the July 2015 RDEIR/SDEIS for the Proposed Bay Delta Conservation Plan 10/30/2015
- CCWD Comments on BDCP July 25, 2014 (PDF)
- CCWD Overview Letter on BDCP July 25, 2014 (PDF)
- Joint Comment Letter on Impacts of BDCP on CVP Contractors February 7, 2013
- CCWD Comments on BDCP Memorandum of Agreement November 16, 2011
- CCWD Letter to Jerry Meral, CNRA Regarding Value of CCWD Assets: February 2, 2011
- Joint Letter on BDCP June 4, 2010
- Joint Letter on BDCP Modeling December 10, 2009
- CCWD Comments on BDCP Operations Sept 16, 2009
- CCWD Comments on BDCP-Conservation Strategy July 2, 2009
- CCWD Comments on BDCP_NOP May 14, 2009
- CCWD Comments on_BDCP Overview December 18, 2008
- CCWD Comments_on_BDCP_Modeling_Assumptions July 25, 2008
- CCWD Comments on BDCP-NOI-NOP May 30, 2008
- CCWD Comments on BDCP Notice of Intent March 24, 2008
- CCWD Signs On To BDCP_Planning_Agreement on August 3, 2007
- CCWD Board of Directors Docket May16, 2007
If the Project is Bult, CCWD Investments in Storage & Facilities are Protected
10/20/17 Recent news stories about the California WaterFix have indicated the state may be considering a smaller scale project instead of the proposed “twin tunnels”
In 2016, CCWD signed a settlement agreement with the state to ensure any water quality or construction impacts to our customers from the construction or operation of the WaterFix would be mitigated.
This still applies to a smaller facility. Whether or not the state reduces the size of the proposed project, CCWD customers should know that if the project is built, their investments in storage and other facilities will be protected.
CCWD’s Perspective on its Settlement Related to the California WaterFix
By Jerry Brown,
CCWD General Manager
April 11, 2016
Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) and the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) recently announced a settlement agreement related to the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, now known as the California Water Fix (CWF), aka “the twin tunnels.”
It is a long and detailed agreement with lots of legal terms, so we wanted to provide a snapshot view
CCWD’s primary mission is, and has always been, to deliver a high quality and reliable supply of water to our customers in an environmentally responsible manner. And it’s this goal that drives all of our work, including coming to this agreement with DWR.
With the state and project proponents continuing to move the CWF forward, CCWD had three options to legally ensure our customers are protected:
1) negotiate (and determine our own fate);
2) proceed with our water rights protest (and let the State Board determine our fate); or
3) sue under the California Environmental Quality Act (and let the courts decide our fate).
We chose a negotiated agreement fully protective of our customer’s investments over protracted and expensive lawsuits.
Our concerns surrounding the CWF have centered heavily on ensuring
The good news is that DWR has heard part of our concerns and was open to mutually determining how to address our drinking water quality concerns. As a result, we are proud to have reached an agreement that provides legally binding and enforceable steps to mitigate any water quality impacts to CCWD if the CWF is built. While the terms of the settlement agreement were negotiated in confidential meetings, the substance of the discussions only included the concerns that have been publicly raised for many years. The concerns about how the tunnels are paid for are not included in this agreement and CCWD will continue to act diligently on our customers behalf on this issue.
Our agreement has two parts – the first protects CCWD facilities during tunnel construction where the tunnels would cross under a CCWD pipeline near two of CCWD’s Delta water supply intakes.
The second part of this agreement will ensure that should there be any water quality degradation at the CCWD’s Delta intakes or Los Vaqueros Reservoir from operation of the tunnels, a portion of CCWD’s water will be conveyed to CCWD’s system from a higher quality source. The redirecting of a portion of CCWD’s supplies from northern intakes will not cause impacts on the Delta and CCWD will not receive any additional water under this agreement. This ensures the Delta environment and other legal water users are not harmed.
Any costs associated with this agreement, including the construction, operation, and upkeep will be paid for 100% by DWR. This agreement will not cause a rate increase to our customers.
It is important to note that CCWD is not a proponent of the CWF and CCWD is not dependent in any way on the project. What we do have is a binding agreement, or insurance policy, should the tunnel project happen that safeguards CCWD’s supply and assures its quality for the people we serve.
CCWD is not abandoning the Delta. CCWD will continue to use its facilities in the Delta and maintains its ability to engage on Delta water quality and broader Delta issues, and will continue to fully engage on concerns with the CWF impacts related to CCWD’s federal water supply contract. This settlement addresses impacts on our facilities and operation which are unique to CCWD.
The CWF is still an active proposal, and only time will tell if it is implemented.
However, we could not roll the dice on this low probability/
The stakes were too high to make a gamble on the tunnels not moving forward when you consider that we serve drinking water to 500,000 people and have invested over $1 billion.